Trump administration proposes dropping huge swath of immigrants from U.S. census, tell me about this news in (https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump-administration/trump-census-immigrants-voting-rcna596856)

The Trump administration has proposed sweeping changes to how the U.S. Census conducts future decennial population counts (specifically targeting the 2030 census), with significant implications for representation and governance:Key Points of the Proposal

• Exclusion from Congressional Apportionment: The administration proposes excluding non-citizens without lawful permanent resident status (such as undocumented immigrants and temporary visa holders) from the official census headcounts used to apportion seats in the U.S. House of Representatives.
• Removal of Demographic Questions: The plan also seeks to eliminate standard questions on race, ethnicity, and sexual orientation from the decennial questionnaire.
• Shifting Political Representation: Because congressional seats and Electoral College votes are distributed based on total population counts, excluding millions of immigrant residents would shift legislative seats and electoral power away from populous, immigrant-heavy, often Democratic-leaning states and urban areas toward more rural regions.
• Impact on Federal Funding: Census figures dictate the distribution of hundreds of billions of dollars annually in federal aid for infrastructure, schools, public transit, and healthcare. Undercounting local populations would sharply reduce funding allocations to communities with high immigrant numbers.

Legal and Constitutional Pushback

• The 14th Amendment: Civil rights organizations and constitutional scholars argue that the policy contradicts the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which explicitly mandates counting the “whole number of persons in each state,” not solely citizens or lawful permanent residents.
• Prior Precedent: This proposal revives efforts from Trump’s previous term to add a citizenship question and bar undocumented immigrants from apportionment, both of which were blocked by federal courts and the Supreme Court.
• Next Steps: The proposed rule has entered a public comment period and is widely expected to trigger immediate lawsuits and extensive federal court challenges.