Allegation that Denver school board member used antisemitic slur dates back to late 2025, tell me about this news in (https://www.denverpost.com/2026/09/15/denver-school-board-antisemitic-slur/)

The report from The Denver Post centers on allegations brought forward by Denver Public Schools (DPS) Board President Xóchitl Gaytán against Board Vice President Monica Hunter, concerning an antisemitic remark allegedly made in late 2025.Key Details of the Story:

• The Core Allegation: Board President Xóchitl Gaytán formally accused Vice President Monica Hunter of using derogatory language targeting a colleague’s Jewish identity and perceived political identity. The alleged remark dates back to late 2025 during discussions over board officer appointments following the autumn board elections.
• Context of the Remark: According to internal communications released through public records requests, Gaytán stated that the derogatory language occurred in connection with Hunter’s refusal to support the colleague for an officer position and her refusal to sit next to that colleague on the board dais. While Gaytán did not publicly name the director in her initial emails, Amy Klein Molkwho is Jewishwas the sole newly elected board member who did not receive an officer role during that reorganization period.
• Broader Governance Dispute: The antisemitism accusation is part of a broader slate of alleged policy violations outlined by Gaytán against both Hunter and Board Treasurer Donald “D.J.” Torres. Gaytán also cited Hunter for allegedly contacting district staff directly regarding school enrollment issues and accused Torres of repeatedly missing board meetings, committee sessions, and canceling meetings with district leadership.
• Pushback and Demand for an Independent Investigation: Hunter strongly denied the accusations, calling them baseless and attributing them to persistent interpersonal conflict among board members. In response, Hunter and Torres sent a formal demand calling for an independent investigation into both the allegations and the process Gaytán used to bring them forward. They argued that the board president should not act as an investigator and requested that any discussions of board censure or discipline be paused until an outside investigation is completed.