MS NOW denied access to White House after Trump said he’s banning the network, CNN and Politico, tell me about this news in (https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/ms-now-denied-access-to-white-house-after-trump-said-he-s-banning-the-network-cnn-and-politico/ar-AA2cyIk5?ocid=BingNewsVerp)

On Saturday morning, September 19, 2026, the White House began enforcing a ban announced by President Donald Trump against three major media organizations: MS NOW (formerly MSNBC), CNN, and Politico.

Key Details of the Event

• Enforcement at the Gates: A reporter and a photographer from MS NOW were turned away when attempting to enter the White House grounds to work. MS NOW White House correspondent Akayla Gardner reported live from outside the security perimeter, stating that a security officer asked her to hand over her press badge, told her it had been disabled, and explained that the decision came from higher up.

• Trump’s Announcement: The enforcement followed a statement posted by Donald Trump on Truth Social on Friday afternoon, where he announced an immediate ban on CNN, MS NOW, and Politico, accusing them of spreading “fake news.” He specifically criticized MS NOW’s rebranding and ratings, accused Politico of bias, and warned that other outlets could face similar bans in the future.

• Network Responses:

  • MS NOW released a statement affirming that it stands behind its reporters and newsroom, emphasizing that the White House belongs to the American people and stating that the network intends to take any and all steps necessary to defend its First Amendment rights.

  • CNN strongly criticized the ban, calling it an unconstitutional attack on press freedoms and stating that its journalists have a constitutional right to report without government interference.

  • Politico similarly announced that it would continue its reporting and vigorously defend its First Amendment rights against attempts to restrict access.

Legal and Press Freedom Context

The action represents a significant escalation in tensions between the administration and the press corps. Legal experts and media organizations have noted that denying or revoking access based on editorial content raises serious First Amendment concerns. Under long-standing legal precedent (notably the 1977 federal appellate ruling in Sherrill v. Knight), while the White House is not obligated to grant credentials to every journalist, it cannot arbitrarily exclude credentialed reporters based on the viewpoint or content of their coverage.