Live updates: Justice Department defends White House media ban ahead of hearing today, tell me about this news in (https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump-administration/live-blog/trump-white-house-ban-iran-china-congress-2026-election-live-updates-rcna599321)

The news reports on a legal battle between the Trump administration and major press organizations regarding media credentials and access to the White House.

Background of the Ban

President Donald Trump ordered a ban restricting White House press access for three major news organizations: CNN, MS NOW (formerly MSNBC), and Politico. Over the preceding weekend, reporters from these organizations had their White House press badges confiscated or deactivated, and CNN was removed from its scheduled presidential pool coverage duties. The administration justified the restriction by accusing the outlets of publishing “fake news,” unfair coverage, and stories based on unnamed sources that it argued posed national security and operational concerns.

The Lawsuit

In response, CNN, MS NOW, and Politico filed a joint federal lawsuit against the administration in Washington, D.C. They argue that:

• First Amendment Violations: The administration engaged in retaliatory “viewpoint discrimination” by punishing reporters solely because it disapproved of their reporting.

• Due Process Protections: Under long-standing legal precedent (including Sherrill v. Knight), once the government establishes a press credentialing system, it cannot arbitrarily strip passes without notice, published standards, or an opportunity to appeal.

• The outlets requested an immediate emergency injunction (temporary restraining order) to restore their journalists’ credentials and access while the broader case proceeds.

The Justice Department’s Defense

Ahead of the emergency court hearing, the U.S. Department of Justice defended the White House’s action in legal filings:

• Executive Discretion: The government contends that physical access to secure White House spaces is a privilege rather than an unqualified constitutional right, falling under the president’s broad authority to control security and operations on executive grounds.

• Denial of Arbitrary Retaliation: The DOJ argued that the administration possesses legitimate operational and security reasons to manage who is granted entry to restricted areas of the complex.

The Court Hearing and Significance

The hearing is being overseen by U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly, who previously presided over the 2018 lawsuit involving CNN correspondent Jim Acosta, in which the court ordered Acosta’s credentials temporarily restored on due process grounds.

The dispute has sparked widespread reaction among the press corps, with other major networks temporarily suspending pooled coverage in solidarity after CNN’s exclusion, while the administration has signaled it is prepared to appeal should the district court rule in favor of the media organizations.