Attorney for lone holdout juror in Lindsay Clancy mistrial pushes back on claims of refusing the law, tell me about this news in (https://www.foxnews.com/us/attorney-lone-holdout-juror-lindsay-clancy-mistrial-pushes-back-claims-refusing-law)
28-09-2026
The article covers remarks made by Edward Paltzik, the attorney representing Michael P. Desronvil, the lone holdout juror whose position led to a mistrial in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial.
Key details from the report include:
Response to Allegations: During jury deliberations, the foreperson sent a note to the judge alleging that Desronvil refused to follow the law regarding reasonable doubt. In response, Paltzik rejected claims that his client disregarded the law, stating that Desronvil had “zero doubt” about his stance and based his decision on “a mountain of evidence.”
Context of the Mistrial: Desronvil was the sole holdout after seven days of deliberation. Eleven other jurors were prepared to find Clancy not criminally responsible by reason of mental illness (postpartum psychosis), while Desronvil held out for a conviction, leading Judge William Sullivan to declare a mistrial on September 4.
Background of the Case: Lindsay Clancy, a former labor and delivery nurse from Duxbury, Massachusetts, admitted to strangling her three young children5-year-old Cora, 3-year-old Dawson, and 8-month-old Callanin January 2023. Her defense argued she suffered from postpartum psychosis, while prosecutors contended she understood the nature of her actions and planned the killings.
Juror’s Stance: Desronvil maintained that the physical evidence and testimony presented during the trial demonstrated that Clancy was aware of what she was doing.
Next Steps: Prosecutors had not yet announced whether they would retry the case, with Clancy scheduled to return to court on September 29.