New Supreme Court term begins with cases on climate change, immigration and gun rights, tell me about this news today

The U.S. Supreme Court opens its new term today with a docket packed with high-stakes legal battles touching on environmental accountability, executive immigration authority, and the Second Amendment.

CBS News

Climate Change Liability

The court kicks off oral arguments with a pivotal lawsuit originating from Boulder, Colorado (Suncor Energy v. County Commissioners of Boulder County). Local officials are attempting to hold major energy companiesincluding Suncor Energy and ExxonMobilfinancially liable under state tort law for local infrastructure damage and climate disaster costs tied to fossil fuel sales and marketing.

CBS News+ 1

The primary legal question is whether federal law preempts municipalities and states from suing fossil fuel producers in state courts. Energy producers argue that allowing state-level tort suits to proceed would create a patchwork of local regulations and effectively impose backdoor carbon taxes. The outcome will set a precedent for dozens of similar lawsuits filed by cities and states nationwide.

CBS News+ 2

Second Amendment and Assault Weapons Bans

Following years of decisions expanding gun rights, the justices are set to tackle state-level restrictions on popular semiautomatic firearms. Multiple states have banned rifles such as AR-15 platforms (frequently categorized as assault weapons). The court will evaluate whether these prohibitions violate the Second Amendment under the historical tradition standard established in Bruen, testing the limits of how far states can go in restricting specific classes of firearms.

Immigration and Executive Power

The docket features contentious challenges surrounding federal immigration enforcement and detention policies. A central dispute addresses mandatory detention policiesspecifically whether the federal government has the authority to detain undocumented immigrants living in the United States indefinitely without access to a bond hearing, even if they have resided in the country for years. Lower appellate courts have frequently split or pushed back against broad executive detention powers, making a definitive high-court ruling critical.

Additional Docket Highlights

Alongside these three primary areas, the court is scheduled to hear arguments on voting procedures (such as requirements regarding documentary proof of citizenship) and disputes concerning religious liberty exemptions in public institutions and state programs.

The National Herald